KBAT 746432 FOOTAGE ANALYSIS
-
By Antonello LUPINO.
My analysis started from 2 points of
view which are:
First
- May be the film is part of an episode in which some
humans are involved in a experiment
carried out by aliens;
Second - the footage is false but it is very well orchestrated.
1) - the
film is probably part of an episode in which some humans are involved in a
experiment done by aliens.
It’s important to say that the
footage is accompanied by a photo (image 4), and by a letter (image 1), in
Russian hand writing, the alleged scientist, and sent by e-mail to a
“Citizens
of the
being a
member of the
This project concerns existence and safety of all human kind. The Russian government
has (word that means that they cannot be proven false, very true, proven) proof
that is able to change life on Earth as we know it.
The Russian government informed the U.S. Government, but neither of the
governments wanted to disclose these proofs.
My responsibility as a scientist and a citizen is to disclose this secret
information. An alien spaceship crashed in the sea Kara just north of the
Siberian plateau.
The extracted (??something??) of crash remains microtype was restored and all
stored information has been deciphered. Fragments from the invention clearly
show experiments conducted on people, which were conducted by the
extraterrestrials.
My life is in danger, and that's why I am relocating from place to place. I will
provide all possible evidence as soon as it will be possible despite all the
complications.
Comrades,
we crossed the line, people ought to know the truth. If you all don't present
the full evidence, I will find a way to do it myself. (end)”.
The footage
The original footage is about 5
seconds long, and shows what seems to be an alleged alien medical room. In a
second time two identical frames have been added, to modify its reproduction
speed, reduced to 1/2 and 1/16 so to better observe the scene. We cannot forget that, with the nowdays
technology, the possibility to mystify a natural phenomenon as well as to
design photographic falsifications, in the field of UFO can always exist.
The sequence shows a young woman, of the apparent age
of about 30/32 years, laying inside a sort of sarcophagus from an unusual form
(image 3).
This woman is covered, from shoulders to the knees, by
a kind of greenish substance that seems to be solid. From what seems to be a
claw, a probe is extracted and because of a change of the visual field, it is
difficult to understand for how many centimeters this probe has been inserted
inside the low abdomen of the woman.
Despite the traumatic fact, the woman looks naturally
soothed, and in some “frames” seems smiling! It is interesting to
underline that the alleged Russian scientist,
answering to the second e-mail of William, has sent a photo that
withdraws a human being of masculine sex inside another sarcophagus, in
soothing state (image 4), covered by the same strange substance over the
woman’s body. A careful eye, can see that close to these, another sarcophagus
is found, presumably that of the young protagonist of the footage (take notice
that the second sarcophagus at this time is empty!).
As I previously stated, during the last 17 years, I
have been analysing persons, who declare having experiences of “alien
abduction” and must honestly say that in the footage there are some themes that
often happen during the “medical” abduction phases.
In the video you can see some particulars noticed only
by those who know the alien abduction phenomenon very well.
The “medical” environment, rather than a place where
the abducted persons are sheltered, it seems to be a laboratory of genetic
experiments. Besides, the shape of the “sarcophaguses” seems to coincide with
the descriptions of those victims I have interviewed, that have been in similar
environments. I guarantee that these abducted, have been analyzed by skilled
expert and judged highly reliable.
We now analyze the content of the footage
I have splitted
the original film in different “frames” in which I have identified some
key-element described here below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
A) The probe extracted by the low
abdomen |
B) The face of the girl and the “sarcophagus”‘ shape |
C) The inside ocular membrane of the alleged alien |
D) The other human being set in the sarcophagus of side to the woman |
Frame A):
1)
The image shows the video done from the trunk to the beginning of the
pelvis. In foreground you can see in the
low central area, one hand probably belonging to a non terrestrial being,
apparently formed by three fingers and laying over to the left thigh of the
alleged “victim.” The right hand of the alleged alien (apparently composed also
by three fingers or claws), grasps a kind of probe (in foreground) that seems
to have been inserted in the low abdomen of the woman unthreading it from her position, perhaps at
the end of an examination rather violent.
2) The
situation seems similar to some abduction cases and/or episodes where
experiments of different nature are practised. The characteristics of the two hands, seem
also to be coherent with those described by some abducted, considering
rettiloid beings present in the abduction place and in violent analyses.
Frame B):
1)
You can notice close up the woman's face, as well as
the sarcophagus. The woman seems to be under
the influence of an apparatus to soothe her provoking pleasant dream episodes
(these details are often remembered by many abducted I have analyzed). The
apparatus is placed on the right temple to make no traumatic memory and remember
the past experience. Many abducted persons often refer to me, during the
technique of “conscious regression”, a train of wave ELF to a frequency of 4/5
Hz., provoking deep sleep and a big range of effects in the dreaming path.
2) You can also see the particular form of the
“sarcophagus”, that correspond to some descriptions given to me by some
abducted, some years ago, about the places in which they were brought after the
contact with different kinds of aliens.
Frame C):
All the footage is
surrounded by a kind of halo, that seems to be the effect of a shot done from
the inside ocular hollow, toward the external environment.
Frame D):
The photo shows another
human being, of presumed masculine sex, also laying into the sarcophagus,
beside the girl. Also this human being shows the same characteristics of the
woman. Half of his body is covered by a “muddy” substance and by a kind of
probe connected to the body. He is also
in a evident state of hypnotic condition.
And
now let’s proceed with the computerized graphic analysis of what it has been
described until now.
Elaborating these frames graphically, I have
considered the frames indicated by the letters B) - C) and D), as follows:
ORIGINALS
|
|
|
|
|
B) The face of the girl and the shape
of the “sarcophagus” |
C) The inside of the ocular membrane and the claw of
the alleged alien |
D) The other human being set in the sarcophagus
beside the woman |
Frame B) Sequence Analysis
Frame
B-1)
With a special graphic filter I have made brighter the
image B).
Some important elements can be distinguished:
- a light green luminescence to left upper side;
- the face of the woman is well seen;
- the particular form of the “sarcophagus”
- a strange device on the right temple.
Frame
B-2)
In the following frame B-2) you can see what I call “artificial
hypnotic device” . In spite of this
dramatic event, the woman, in a dreaming phase, looks smiling.
C) frame analysis
In frame C)
there are further important facts:
- what seems to be two claws, left and right;
- the probe that initially was inserted in the lower
stomach of the woman;
In the graphically elaborated frame, I try to compare
the probe length at the explant moment with that one in frame C).
C-1) From the graphic comparison on the right, the
presence of two clawed hands is pointed out (presumably three fingers). While
the left hand is leaning on the thigh of the woman, the other one seems to
extract what appears to be a probe of about 20cm long. To the right part there is what I
consider the logical sequence of the footage, better the vision of the probe
just drawn, between the claws of the alleged alien. Measuring the probe from
the bulb to the terminal part again, I realize that it is still 20cm long, and
therefore I conclude that the probe, at the beginning of the film it was just
leaned on the woman’s body.
C-2) Besides,
examining the limbs grasping the probe, these are more similar to claws. In effects they correspond to the description done by
numerous witness involved in contacts with “reptiles” beings, or the three
clawed fingers.
D) frame analysis
In this frame, sent by the alleged scientist to Mr
William, the close up subject is a man
and not more the woman, which instead appears inside the “sarcophagus” in the
distance at the end of the room. In effects, this would strength the hypothesis
that the “videoclip” is more than one. What however could be ignored to a first
analysis of D) frame, made brighter from a graphic filter, is that ocular halo
form is missing, present on the contrary in the entire footage KBAT746432.
Secondarily, it is rather strange that, considering the variety of human
beings, with normal aspect,
the classical belly and well overweight, the two subjects in the film
and in the photo (man and woman), are
like cinema actor stereotype.
Let’s
consider now other three significant “frames”.
|
|
|
|
|
E) the video from inside the eye |
F) a shadow in the right frame |
G) the direction of the lights |
E) frame analysis
Observing this image, you can see a light pink halo
ocular form, which edging the subject forefront. According to the scientist of
the “kbat746432” project, who put the
footage in Internet, the film would have been extracted by a microchip inside
the eye of an alleged alien, recovered after a crash near
During my abduction researches, I
have analyzed many persons that have been abducted and suffered about some
surgery, due to the application of miniaturized probes, inside muscular and
bone tissues, especially in the brain.
Such probes
were inserted in most cases, inside the gland pituitary and/or in the visual
and audit cortex. The
scheme was simple: “The eye received the impulses related to the visualized
image, therefore them were sent to the brain for decode and interpretation, and
I know on. If the microchip is grafted
on the Visual Bark, this will memorize all the images that the eye see at that
time. They will be therefore clear images without halos, without visions of the
ocular one, as the eye will record what the person sees”. The image E) recorded
by the microchip represent a non reliable reduction of the visual campo of the
alien. It is not possible that the cartilage of the ocular cable is so
transparent, unless an artificial hollow has been created to insert an
objective video. From my point of view, if we have decided to believe that we
are not alone and that our Planet is in contact with different alien races, it
is not possible that these aliens, coming from other Planets, with an
incredible technology, use primitive techniques to record these kind of
surgeries, the so called “abduction”.
F) frame
analysis
Observing this specific frame, to
the right centre, you can see, above the “claws”, something like a head of
profile. In the elaborated frame, indicated by letter F-1), I have underlined
such “shade”, that seems to belong to the like a head of an alien of the
so-called ”reptilians” race. Such shade
stays in the visual field for some tenth, after that it fades away. This means
that who recorded the footage knows very well the phenomenon of the alien
abductions.
G) frame
analysis
In this frame, I
have analyzed the position of the light sources inside the environment in which
the film has been shot, trying to understand the quantity.
After having
done a thermographic analysis of the image F), I have tried to calculate the
diffusions of the light sources to the point in which the same were assembled. From the image F-1) you can notice that the light is
focused on the woman inside the “sarcophagus”; behind her own head and at her
left side.
Tracing some hypothetical lines of
lights, the four lighted points underline coincides perfectly with what the
author meant, that is: the presumed extraction of the probe from the low
abdomen of the woman, the probes connected to the body, the “claws” of the
strange creature and, at last, a fact that happened on the panel set behind the
woman bedside (I will later clarify). Therefore the light is radiated by four
points: A-B-C-D, corresponding probably to four light sources (who recorded the
film, knows data about abductions, but doesn’t know that the alien “medical”
rooms, would have been illuminated constantly by a kind of solid white
light, that would not seem to have any
artificial origin!).
At the end of this analyses, we consider the last
three frames:
|
|
|
|
|
|
G) a light source appears to
the right. |
H) the source assumes a bright form and comes out on
the footage. |
I) to the left the light source creates, a kind of oleographic effect. |
L) the light source is found now to the left and
illuminates the empty sarcophagus to side. |
G) frame analysis
A light source of presumed
artificial origin (B) is created behind the woman head that partially
illuminates the central upper part of the footage and the “sarcophagus” beside (A).
The light seems to come from behind a transparent wall.
H) frame analysis
The brightness move towards the left
side of the film creating a further visual effect that illuminates the wall
behind the woman and a piece of the “sarcophagus.” In this exact point, the
light source illuminates the right breast and the side of the woman, as well as
a piece of the second sarcophagus that
is still empty, at the moment.
I) frame analysis
In this frame, the light source, creates
an effect to the upper centre of the sequence, which seems a reflex of the
second sarcophagus (B), which begins to
be visible almost entirely (A). Going ahead, you can notice that the light
source assumes a “jellyfish” shape. In effects, the light going behind the head
of the woman, does not illuminates her face, that remains always in shade (in
my frames the images are more clean as I have used some
filters to create more light!).
L) frame analysis
In this sequence, the light source
lies completely on the left (A), and with a sort of “flash”, it very well
illuminates also the second “sarcophagus” (B),
close to the woman.
And here is the footage end.
However I am continuing my analysis of
the letter sent by the presumed scientist.
I asked to Mrs Gabriella GRANARA, a
Russian-Italian translator, to translate the letter. Then
have done a graphological and psychological analysis of the
subject-writer. These are my ideas:
COMMENT
The first part of the letter, up to the sentence “my duty…” it has been
written with readable characters, has regular spacing and there are no
handwriting mistakes.
It has the style of an official letter typical of the Soviet period and
is addressed “To the citizens…” of the
The following part seems
written in a second time and with a different state of mind: the characters are
smaller and in some parts irregular. There are corrections and a cancellation
and the spacing are lesser and closer.
The sentence of the
“microchip” is not complete, it is like
a noun is missing, not saying from what the microchip has been extracted.
The message is laconic, a
short communication from someone who is in a hurry and it contains, at the end,
an appellative “companions” that might
indicate the camerade in fight, the job companions or party companions. In this
sentence they are the recipients of the
letter.
Anomalies: the letter hasn’t the date, nor signature but
quotes in detail the project name.
Psyco/graphological analysis
To Mrs Granara’s comments, I add
that the letter, in his context, seems to be written by two completely
different personalities. The first part is more technical and “loyal to the
duty of its own mission”, as a “companion”
of the soviet would have done; the second part, has no technique and data to
analyze. Observing spacing and characters in the first case it comes out a
strong and sure personality, typical of someone who has its own goal to reach.
In the second part, it seems really that previous personality has disappeared,
to give place to a timorous and hesitant one. It seems to be written by another
person that tries its best to be technical and at the same time having suicide
intentions.
In my opinion, the letter could be
the first part of a memory we have not
received yet, for unknown reasons.
Conclusions
At the beginning of this analysis I
have stated beforehand that the KBAT footage has a worrying content, if
true. However, I have formulated two different hypothesis: that it is
true, or it belongs to a well organized fiction.
With today’s technology it is very
easy to perform some forgeries and give them out for true.
It is very difficult for the researches to be sure
about tests and especially about video or photos. Therefore, following the
suggestions of the Exopolitics group, headed by Doctor Michael Salla and those
of Disclosure Project of Professor Steven Greer, I thought to establish a valid
protocol of investigation to be used in cases of presumed ufologic
disinformation. I used this protocol in these analysis allowing me to reach
conclusions here above mentioned. I am not inviting to condemn people having
Ufo sighting, or contacted, abducted, or
immediately give for fake all the films produced about it.
I simply say that, a system that fears the “Big
Secret” will be divulged tries all his means (believe me it has a lot of), to
create misinformation, or to gradually prepare people to a gradual
announcement, avoiding existential shocks in the whole Planet. The tactic is
always the same: first mix wisely a real fact with fiction elements, then give
the message out and therefore listening and waiting.
I must conclude
these comments about the footage KBAT 746432, highlighting that is a film
recorded for other purposes without any data to define it is authentic. May be
is a coincidence, but for me the women in the film is very like to the
beautiful actress Catherine Bell, in the role of the Greatest Sarah MacKenzie
in the fortunate series TV JAG–Lawyers in uniform. Nevertheless I am convinced that, such film has been realized by experts
that know very well elements of alien abductions, like as technology used for
the contact to the place and way of doing it.
In case I would have new
elements to evaluate I’ll be willing to admit I was wrong on the whole or on
one part of it, but at this point it is the only conclusion I have drawn.
Therefore I am waiting for the scientist will turn up to my e-mail address: cuidirect@libero.it, to have more
details and to let you know the truth.
If we don't want to play these people’s game, we must
stir our consciences and understand the its mechanism, helping who has
difficulty to understand this phenomenon, to know it better with no fear.
Remember: “Who is afraid can be easily dominated refusing the contact with
other beings”.
You will find the whole documentation on the site: www.ufocui.it
I wills soon examine another footage, recorded near
the islands “Franz Joseph Land”, situated in the Kara Sea, North Siberia, in
which you can glimpse the rests of that discoverers affirm to be an alien
spaceship and/or a giantic creature.
Waiting
for further news and contacts from who is interested in mtDNA correlation,
Kind regards
The light of the truth always illuminates our path.
Antonello LUPINO